DBU PhD (Desh Bhagat University): Admission Process, Sujects, Syllbus, Eligibility Criteria.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp

Ph.D/MPhil Research Desh Bhagat University

Prologue to Ph.D/M.Phil at Desh Bhagat University

Desh Bhagat University, being one of the best University-based research establishments in the country, is a trailblazer among Indian colleges in the locale of innovation sends and has contributed a gigantic obligation to the economy, wellbeing mindfulness and development. What makes us significantly more fascinating is the woody feel to soak imaginative greatness in the midst of peacefulness and quietness to make historic investigation and research. At the branch of Research and Advancement, DBU unites researchers across its scope of exemplary characters and uses its most complex assets to acclimatize multi-layered splendor into research by deleting the complexities of the subject. Desh Bhagat University is a residence to an unfathomable and different compass of fastidious and indefatigable, worldwide understudies and scholastic researchers. While a few educational establishments are satisfied by simply creating new research, yet at DBU we go past this inhabitant by dependably steadfast to similarly bestow the learning we arise through settled affiliations and points of interaction with government and modern area, and through substantial relations with our scholarly partners and accomplices from around the globe.

Desh-Bhagar-University-DBU-Ph-D-Admission-Entrance-Exam-Date

Desh Bhagat University is resolutely dedicated to the relevant zones of research and improvement that have been distributed on need premise by the Focal and State legislatures, outlining specific prerequisite scopes of research. We’ve simplified it for you to investigate a level of the various experts and developments at DBU that are gathered in these middle districts.

Key Research Plan is an immovable yet versatile framework at DBU that will spellbind the creative local area and our accessories in the difficulties being looked by humankind in the 21st hundred years. It will eventually result into the confirmation that our researchers will be judicious in enduring the respected assignment of research in a feeling that will engage them to blossom.

Ph.D Ordinances: Ph.D From Desh Bhagat University

Laws connected with the degrees, recognitions, authentications and other scholastic differentiations, to be granted by the University, the capabilities for the equivalent and the methodology, to be embraced for allowing and acquiring something very similar.

Dependent upon the arrangements of the Demonstration, the Guidelines and Techniques concerning segment 27(3)(iii) of Statutes for the said matter are given underneath :

The Scholarly Committee will endorse the methodology for degrees, confirmations, testaments and other scholastic differentiations, to be granted by the University and the capabilities for the equivalent.

The chancellor may on the suggestion of the Overseeing Body by an extraordinary goal passed with simultaneousness of at least two-third individuals present and casting a ballot pull out a recognition or degree or testament or other scholarly qualification gave by the University in the accompanying cases:

1             In the event that an individual has offered a misleading expression about his scholarly qualifications or has involved counterfeit records for getting admission to a program and the reality has been demonstrated at any later stage.

2             In the event that an individual has been sentenced by an official courtroom for moral turpitude or has been viewed as at fault for shameful direct, the scholarly qualification granted to him/her, if any, might be removed.

            A definitive ability to conclude all such cases will vest with the Chancellor.

Enrolment, Enlistment and Grant of Level of M.Phil and Specialist of Reasoning (Ph.D) in Different Resources of Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh (Punjab)

The M.Phil/Ph.D. Program

These mandates will come into force with prompt impact. Nothing in these mandates will be considered to suspend the University from altering these laws and some other revised statute, if any and the equivalent will apply to all understudies who got enlisted/enrolled from June, 2016.

The Striking Highlights

1             Admission will be chiefly founded on Entry Test, Qualifying Assessment rate and interview, appropriately following the legitimacy – cum – reservation strategy of Punjab govt.

            Just the foreordained number of understudies will be confessed to the Projects which might fluctuate from one year to another.

3             Distribution of Guide for a chose understudy will be concluded by the concerned Division in a proper way relying on the quantity of understudies per employee, the accessible specialization among the staff guides and research interest of the understudies as demonstrated during interview by the understudy.

            Research Researchers should concentrate on the endorsed course work at the University will be treated as pre-Ph.D. Course.

5             Research work might be done either on full – time premise or on part – time premise.

6             Proposal will be inspected by the Leading body of Analysts comprising of no less than two inspectors out of which somewhere around one will be from outside the Area for example Punjab, Haryana, J and K, H.P, Chandigarh and Delhi.

7             Ph.D Projects will NOT be directed through Distance Instruction Mode.

8             An up-and-comer owned up to M.Phil Program may out of the blue before the accommodation of his/her postulation , demand the concerned Top of the Division for change of his/her admission/enrolment from M.Phil to Ph.D program. Such a solicitation will be sent to the Senior member Research and will be sanctioned by workforce research board, in the event that a seat is accessible.

            A competitor confessed to Ph.D program won’t be permitted to change over his enrollment into M.Phil program.

10           These Guidelines of Ph.D are additionally appropriate to M.Phil.

Desh Bhagat University PhD Admisssion

DBU Desh Bhagat University Ph.D Eligibility Criteria

For M.Phil

M.A./M.Sc./M.Com./Graduate degree with atleast 55% imprints. An unwinding of 5% imprints would be given to SC/ST and Genuinely Tested/Handicapped up-and-comers.

For Ph.D.

An up-and-comer looking for admission to Ph.D. program should fulfill the accompanying necessities:

1             Graduate degree in the concerned/partnered (not entirely settled by the Departmental Research Board) with atleast 55% imprints or B+ grade at Graduate degree (SC/ST and actually tested/handicapped applicants will get 5% unwinding in post-graduation marks).

Or on the other hand

2             M.Phil Degree with B+ or identical grade.

Or then again

3             An individual whose M.Phil exposition has been assessed and the viva voce is forthcoming might be confessed to the Ph.D program of a similar organization

NOTE: In the event that an up-and-comer is granted grade in M.Phil ,yet the reviewing example of the M.Phil, granting University is not quite the same as that material in Desh Bhagat University, then, at that point, the General Grade Point Normal (OGPA) of the competitor will be changed over into level of imprints applying the accompanying equation.

OGPA

x100

X

x= All out Focuses

In the event that the rate so got is 55% or more, the applicant’s grade will be considered as B+ grade with the end goal of admission to Ph.D. program.

Ph.D Admission Technique: DBU Ph D Admission Process

            The university will advise the M.Phil/Ph.D. program referencing number of seats accessible under each subject and the timetable of Entry Test through a notice distributed in driving papers/site two times in a year.

            The competitor will apply for admission in the M.Phil/Ph.D program in the endorsed structure to Dignitary Research.

3             The utilizations of the up-and-comers will be investigated by the M.Phil/Ph.D. enrolment Panel headed by Dignitary Research.

4             Competitor will be conceded based on merit list ready through Entry test marks, marks acquired in the passing assessment and interview according to the rules outlined by the University now and again founded on UGC (Least Principles and Strategy for Grant of Ph.D Degree) Guidelines 2016.

5             At the hour of admission, the University will follow Public/State Reservation strategy. The competitor will be confessed to PhD Program either straightforwardly or in a roundabout way subsequent to doing M.Phil.

Direct Ph.D Admission: Desh Bhagat University Ph D Admission Process

Those up-and-comers who qualify UGC-NET/CSIR (JRF) Assessment/SLET/Entryway/or are Educator Cooperation holders or DST (Motivate/ICMR/Some other Public Office Individual or have Ph.D degree in any subject are absolved from showing up in entrance test. The determination of these competitors will be founded on their exhibition in the meeting as well as their general Scholarly Legitimacy.

Through M.Phil.

For up-and-comers looking for admission to Ph.D. program after M.Phil. course, following criteria will be relevant:

1             Up-and-comers who have acquired M.Phil. degree with least B+ grade or identical from Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh or some other perceived University as a customary understudy and whose admission at the M.Phil level has experienced an entry test, are excluded from showing up in the entry test for Ph.D. Program.

2             Applicants who have gotten M.Phil. from different colleges through Distance Training or had joined M.Phil without entrance Test should show up in the entry test and qualify the test and will have total the course function according to run the show.

NOTE: The up-and-comers who qualify the entry test will be remembered for the pool of possibility for M.Phil/Ph.D. Their candidature will stay legitimate for two Scholarly meetings for example up to the date of M.Phil/Ph.D. entrance test to be held following two years. A competitor having passed M.Phil/Ph.D. entrance test is expected to accomplish the course work of one semester (a half year term) in the concerned subject in the University. The Course work would incorporate THREE papers, to be concluded by the Research Sheets for the separate subjects/disciplines (Out of Three papers, one paper might be on “Subject Explicit” other Research Strategy). On culmination of the course work, he/she will be relegated a boss.

PhD Entrance Test And Choice: Desh Bhagat University (DBU)

Entrance Test

The Entry Test will have the accompanying four parts ( All out weight age 100 focuses):

  1. Research Approach (weight age half)
  2. Respective Subject Substance Information (weight age half)

The idea of the Test will be MCQ type.

The part (a) will have inquiries on testing

1     scientific capacity,

2     ability to think

3     research fitness and

4     research related data.

Each sub-part will have equivalent weight age.

Inquiries in parts (b) and (c) will relate to

    utilitarian abilities targeting testing the fundamental information on the applicant in the separate regions.

Part (d) will be founded on

2     the prospectuses of ‘center’ courses/papers learned at the Expert s’ level in the concerned subject.

The inquiry paper will be of 2 Hour length.

The University will keep up with the rundown of all the M.Phil/Ph.D enrolled on its site on year wise premise.

Interview

Up-and-comers who effectively finish the Entry Assessment will be welcomed for individual meeting. At the hour of interview, competitors are supposed to examine their research interest/region with the meeting board. Interview is fundamental for the Ph.D programs. It will be as Collaboration.

Choice Criteria For Enrolment

1     The between se value of up-and-comers showing up in test will be made based on merit, determined according to the accompanying criteria:

2     Weight age to marks in Expert Program : 25%

3     Weight age to marks in M.Phil Program : 05%

4     Weight age to marks in entrance test : half

5     Weight age to talk with : 20%

  1. Only the pre-decided number of understudies, in light of the accessible endorsed research bosses [with concerned specialization/research interest] will be chosen for admission to Ph.D. also, the rundown of effective applicants will be delivered. The aftereffect of the test will stay legitimate for ensuing 2 back to back years.

Charge

All applicants should pay charges as endorsed by the University now and again for different purposes for M.Phil/Ph.D. degree.

DBU PhD System For Enrolment For Course Work

The qualified competitors can enlist themselves for Ph.D. degree by topping off the Enrolment Structure. The up-and-comers who are expected to do the Ph.D. Course function according to rules will top off the structures by the specified date to join the course work. The competitors who are absolved from doing the Ph.D. course fill in according to rules can enlist themselves for Ph.D. degree all the all year by topping off the Enrolment Structure.

Course Work For M.Phil/Ph.D. Program

The up-and-comer qualifying the entry test or the individuals who are absolved from entrance test should pass Ph.D. course work before enlistment in the Ph.D. program of the University.

1     a) in the event of M.Phil. pass up-and-comers, following circumstances will be pertinent for course work:

    Applicants who have passed M.Phil. degree with least B+ grade as standard understudy from Desh Bhagat University, Mandigobindgarh or some other perceived University and have accomplished comparable course work in M.Phil Program are absolved from doing Ph.D. course work for getting enlisted to Ph.D. Program.

3     b) Course work will be excluded for the people who have finished Ph.D .degree with course work in any subject from any perceived University.

Construction and Span of M.Phil/Ph.D. Course Work

There will be two models for M.Phil/Ph.D. course work:

  1. Statistical Model and
  2. Non-Factual Model

Measurable Model is appropriate to the accompanying subjects:

  1. Management
  2. Commerce
  3. Economics
  4. Physical Instruction
  5. Psychology
  6. Public Organization

The course work will comprise of the accompanying:

Paper 1 Research System, Survey of Writing and Rudimentary Insights and Non Measurable model 7 credits

Paper 3 Center/Necessary subject of the Discipline 7 credits

Paper 4 Class/Power Point show 2 credits

Absolute 16 credits

* M.Phil/Ph.D researcher needs to get at least 55% checks or its identical grade in the UGC 7-point scale in the course work.

DBU Phd Duration: Ph D Length of the program

1     M.Phil program will be for a base length of 2 back to back semesters/one year and a limit of 4 successive semesters/long term.

2     Ph.D program will be for a base span of three years , including course work and a limit of six years.

3     Augmentation past as far as possible will be administered by the significant conditions as specified in the rule/mandate of the University.

4     The ladies up-and-comers and people with handicap might be permitted an unwinding of one year for M.Phil and two years for Ph.D in the most extreme span. The ladies competitors might be given maternity leave/youngster care depart once in the whole span of M.Phil/Ph.D for upto 240 days.

Course Construction And Paper For M.Phil Program

The M.Phil course in the principal semester will comprise of the papers endorsed for Ph.D in the concerned subject and Exposition in the subsequent semester. Paper/Postulation is given either palatable/unacceptable Course on Exposition will be introduced by an Up-and-comer as Pre-accommodation workshop in the particular division, prior to submitting thesis, in view of stretched out unique to be submitted in 5 printed versions and 2 Compact discs . The motivation behind the class is to empower the possibility to talk about his discoveries and the reason for something very similar. The M.Phil Researcher is expected to distribute no less than one research paper before conclusive accommodation

PhD Participation

A competitor owned up to Ph.D. Course Work should satisfy the accompanying prerequisites:

  1. Has been on the rolls of the Division all through the semester going before the assessment.
  2. Has went to at least 75% of the quantity of talks conveyed, classes, intelligent meetings, instructional exercises and so forth in each paper.
  3. The lack in the participation of talks by the applicant must be supported according to rules made by the University occasionally.
Endorsement of Prospectus

Diagram of tests, schedules and courses of perusing will be ready and finished by the concerned Division Research Panel. It will be supported by the Scholastic Gathering.

Nonstop Appraisal and Last University Assessment :

In each paper aside from Course/Power point show, half weightage will be given to constant evaluation or sessional work which will comprise of two house tests (30%), one task (10%), and one class (10%). Out of two MST’stests, normal of twowill be thought of. 55%weightage in each paper will be given to conclusive University assessment. Eligibility for M.Phil/Ph.D Course Work possibility to show up in University Assessment The base number of talks conveyed will be 90 for each paper. Each talk will be of one hour span. Each paper will convey 100 imprints. Just those up-and-comers will be permitted to show up in the University assessment who fulfill the accompanying prerequisites:

1     Have been on the rolls of Division worried all through the semester going before the assessment.

   Have procured a base B grade or 50 % marks in the sessional work.

3     Have gone to at the very least 75% of the all out addresses conveyed in each paper (hypothesis/functional/instructional exercises/courses and so on), independently.

PhD Arrangement of Results

The outcome Obviously Work (independently for inside appraisal and Last University Assessment) will be arranged concerning Imprints.

  • Least Necessity to Pass Ph.D Course Work:
  • A competitor will be expected to procure atleast 55% imprints in each paper to pass the course work. The Competitor getting marks in the Course Work lower than the recommended imprints can work on his/her presentation by returning in the Course work paper(s) of his/her decision. For this, he/she will be given just a single opportunity to show up in the ensuing Improvement assessment.

Announcement of Result:

The Regulator of Assessments will distribute a rundown of competitors who have passed the Ph.D. Course Work assessment and issue definite imprints endorsement, showing the imprints acquired by the applicant independently in inner appraisal (meeting work), and last University assessment. No conventional degree will be granted to the contender for passing Ph.D. Course Work. Just an endorsement with this impact will be given, whenever mentioned/required.

Eligibility and Arrangement of Boss

The University will dispense the boss who is the ordinary workforce/researcher of Desh Bhagat University holding Ph.D. degree and having distributed research work, for example, books or research papers in Research diaries. He is likewise expected to have proof of doing some research work as of now.

The Bad habit Chancellor, at whenever, on the proposal of the Division Research Board (DRB), will be enabled to pull out the boss of a research understudy. However, DRB can make such a proposal just on the grounds of:

     moral turpitude and/or

     counterfeiting, as well as

     any demonstration hurting the interest of the University/Understudies.

 

If fundamental, Co-manager might be designated from inside a similar Division or of an alternate Branch of a similar University. Be that as it may, a composed defense for having a Co-boss will go with the application properly suggested by the Division Research Board. Just such master might be proposed as Co-manager who has a Ph.D

Coming up next is as far as possible in regards to the quantity of competitors who can be enlisted for Ph.D. Degree with a Manager/Co-boss.

     Teacher/Partner Teacher – 4

     Peruser/Academic partner – 6

     Teacher – 8

An up-and-comer holding UGC-CSIR (NET) JRF and enlisted/enrolled under Instructor/Colleague Teacher or Peruser/Academic partner will be well beyond the recommended furthest reaches of the separate educator as expressed previously. Every boss will be permitted to direct one extra supported unfamiliar understudy having legitimate Research Visa for doing Ph.D under the ICCR/other Scholarly trade Program of the Public authority.

The bosses can be named till the date of retirement or till the date of expiry of the re-business and in excellent cases even past that date.

  1. Provided further that no relative of the up-and-comer like spouse, husband, child, girl, sister, sibling, wife’s or alternately husband’s siblings, sibling’s child and little girl, sister’s child and girl, first cousin, nephew, stupendous – child, excellent girl, or such other individual as may be considered a nearby connection by the Bad habit Chancellor will be delegated as Boss/Co-Manager. A declaration with this impact will be given by the Manager/Co-boss alongside the application for enrolment.
  2. Normally solicitation of the up-and-comer in regards to the decision of Boss or a Co-Manager will be acknowledged. Nonetheless, in the event that, the Division Research Board disagrees with it, then the Board’s report alongside the reasons and the whole issue in regards to the arrangement of Manager/Co-Boss will be at long last chosen by the Bad habit Chancellor.
  3. If a competitor wishes to change the boss before the expiry of two years after enrollment, he/she would present an application to the Dignitary Research through Top of the Division giving reasons thereof for such a change. This will be inspected by a council comprising of the accompanying:
  4. Senior member Scholastic Undertakings (Executive)
  5. Senior member Research
  6. Dignitary of the Personnel/Overseer of the School
  7. Top of the Division
  8. Two Teachers to be selected by the Bad habit Chancellor.
  9. In the event that any of the above is a Boss or Co – manager, or proposed Boss or Co-boss, he/she won’t be an individual from the above board of trustees.
  10. If a competitor has any desire to change the manager after expiry of two years, his application will be alluded by the Senior member Research to the Bad habit Chancellor with proposal for ultimate choice.
  11. Enlistment For Ph.D
  12. Accommodation and Show of Outline for Ph.D. Enlistment
  13. The up-and-comer will present his application for enrollment on the endorsed structure in the span of a half year of enrolment on the off chance that the competitor is excluded from doing Ph.D. Course work or in something like three months from the date of announcement of aftereffect of Ph.D . Course work, assuming that the competitor has taken admission to Ph.D. Course Work. This period might be expanded upto a further time of 90 days on installment of the recommended expense.
  14. Duplicates of the Summation for enrollment for Ph.D. Degree will be given to the individuals from Division Research Board ahead of time to the date of show of course. It is figured out that all lacks/upgrades to be made in the summary will be gotten comfortable the gathering of Division Research Board.
  15. The applicant will submit required number of printed copies of rundown ( assuggested by Research Office) providing brief layouts showing the motivation/objective of the research, audit of writing, general methodology or potentially research philosophy to be utilized, speculative arrangement of work/section conspire, catalog, significant speculation, conditional title of the work, whether distributed or unpublished and expected discoveries and so forth of the proposed Research work. The date of enlistment for Ph.D. degree will be thought of
  16. either as the date of introducing the summary before the DRB or the date of passing of Ph.D. Course Work, whichever is later.
  17. The up-and-comer will be expected to introduce outline relating to Enrollment on the subject of his/her concentrate within the sight of Division Research Board to which different instructors of the Office/Workforce and Research Boss of the competitor may likewise be welcomed.
  18. Those applicants who are excluded from Ph.D. Course Work will be enlisted for Ph.D. Degree from the date of endorsement of workshop before the Division Research Board.
  19. The Division Research Board while suggesting enlistment of the contender for thought of Workforce Research Board (FRB) will send a nitty gritty note about the reasonableness of the point as likewise the Research Procedure proposed by the competitor. The note will incorporate the names of the individuals from workforce present at the gathering, the term of the show, conversation and its ultimate result. The Research Manager would be expected to give explicit remarks on the rundown presented by the competitor. On the off chance that the Division Research Board doesn’t support the point, the case will be alluded to FRB, giving itemized report with reasons thereof for its ultimate conclusion. After the date of URB meeting is fixed and a cut off date is circled by the Dignitary Research to the Tops of the Divisions, no instances of enrollment will ordinarily be engaged in that planned gathering of URB.
  20. Following endorsement of the point for Ph.D, it will be enrolled for the sake of specific competitor and the letter with that impact will be issue to the up-and-comer with in multi week by the Research Cell.
  21. The time of summary accommodation and show might be expanded upto further a time of 90 days on installment of the recommended expense
  22. Point Alteration
  23. A competitor may in no less than one year of his/her enlistment change the title/plan of his/her subject with the endorsement of the Division Research Board. Given that the FRB might permit alteration to be made in the plan/title of subject even following one year, assuming in the considered assessment of the board, the adjustment proposed involved no significant change in the first plan and extent of the subject.
  24. Accommodation of Progress Report
  25. A competitor whose point has been enlisted for Ph.D. degree will be expected to submit six month to month progress report to the Research Cell.
  26. Pre-accommodation of Ph.D Theory
  27. Before accommodation of the proposition, the understudies will make a pre-Ph. D. show in theDepartment that will be available to all employees and research understudies, for getting criticism and remarks, which might be appropriately integrated into the draft postulation under the direction of the boss.
  28. The Ph. D. up-and-comers will distribute something like two research paper in a refereed diary/patent before the accommodation of the proposition for assessment, and produce the proof for a similar as acknowledgment letter or the reproduce of the paper.
  1. Accommodation Of Postulation
  2. A postulation to be introduced by the up-and-comer should be a piece of unique research work described either by the revelation of new realities or by new translation of realities or speculations or ought to comprise of applied work like creating and manufacturing exceptional instruments or contraption and ought to show the competitor’s ability for basic assessment and judgment and for clear show.
  3. The up-and-comer won’t be allowed to present his postulation for the degree except if his manager is fulfilled that the proposal introduced truly deserve introducing/submitting before the analysts for the assessment for the honor of the Ph.D. Degree. In the event of an unfavorable report of the Manager, the up-and-comer might make a portrayal to the Bad habit – Chancellor.
  4. Each up-and-comer might educate the workplace regarding Dignitary Research through a letter sent by his boss and the Top of the Division worried that he/she expects to present his/her proposal inside a time of 90 days alongside four hard and one delicate duplicate of expanded digests of the proposition. The workplace of Dignitary Research would then handle the application and make strides for the arrangement of board of Inspectors and get acknowledgment from the concerned Analysts, before the expiry of 90 days.
  5. An up-and-comer will present the Ph.D. Postulation not later than 90 days from the date of show of pre-accommodation workshop.
  6. In the event of non-accommodation of postulation inside the specified period, the applicant can look for augmentation of time from the Dignitary, Research on installment of recommended late charge.
  7. A competitor is expected to apply recorded as a hard copy to the Top of the Division that he/she is in a situation to present his/her postulation and give a pre – accommodation workshop. The Top of the Division will lead such a workshop at the earliest however not later than 30 days from the date of use. In the event that, the show isn’t coordinated in no less than 30 days from the date of utilization, the up-and-comer might move toward Dignitary, Research who will guarantee that needful is managed right away.
  8. At the hour of accommodation of Ph.D. postulation by the applicant, he/she should create proof of having somewhere around two research paper distributed or acknowledged for distribution in refereed Diaries/patent connected with his subject on which he has been enlisted for Ph.D. Degree and out of the scholarly work remembered for the proposition. At the hour of accommodation of Ph.D. proposal by the competitor, a declaration will be presented by the up-and-comer that the proposition is a piece of unique and bonafide research work of the competitor, no part of the postulation is taken from any book or research paper without citing the references to the book or research paper and no part is duplicated or counterfeited from any book or research paper without legitimate reference.
  9. A comparable testament will likewise be given by the manager/co-boss by and large.
  10. On the off chance that there is a protest by the Outside Analyst or by any other person of counterfeiting or duplicating of specific bits in the Ph.D./M.Phil. proposal or Task Reports of different assessments, such protests will be inspected by a council comprising of :
  • Dean Scholastic Issues (Administrator)
  • Dean Research
  • Dean of the Workforce/Head of the School
  • Concerned Top of the Division
  • Controller/Extra Regulator, Assessments
  • Two Teachers from the equivalent or united Staff to be named by the Bad habit – Chancellor
  • On the off chance that any of the above individuals is a manager or co-boss, he won’t be an individual from the above panel.
  • In the event that counterfeiting or duplicating of any sort is laid out, the quantum of discipline contingent on the nature and degree of replicating/counterfeiting, to be suggested by the panel, can be any at least one of the accompanying:
  • The applicant might be approached to change and resubmit the Proposal/Task Report subsequent to erasing the appropriated/replicated parts from the text of the postulation.
  • The Proposal/Task Report might be through and through dismissed.
  • The competitor might be suspended from showing up in any University Assessment for a period upto 5 years and the manager may likewise be suspended from directing any applicant of Ph.D./M.Phil./Task Report for a comparative period.
  • Period Expected For Accommodation of Postulation
  • The competitor will present his/her proposition in no less than a long time from the date of
  • enrolment for the course work or in somewhere around a long time from the date of Enrollment of his/her subject for Ph.D.
  • The applicant will submit four printed copies and four Compact discs of the proposal to the Postulation Assessment Cell.
  • The base time frame expected for accommodation of postulation is two years after enrollment.
  • The Enlistment of up-and-comers who neglect to present their proposal inside the specified period as above or who neglect to apply for award of augmentation under Mandate 13 would naturally stand dropped.
  • Tops of the Divisions while sending a Ph.D. proposition to the workplace of the Dignitary Research for assessment will guarantee that the competitor presents a duplicate of “No Duty Testament” complete in all regards including that of Division, Research Branch, Library, Inn/Senior member Understudies Government assistance and Records Segment. A Ph.D. Proposition not joined by the “No Contribution Declaration” won’t be acknowledged in the postulation section(except for educators and representatives who are on the compensation rolls of Desh Bhagat University)
  • Augmentation in Period/Approbation of Deferral
  • No less than 90 days before the expiry of three years, a competitor looking for expansion will present a Complete Advancement Report of the work done by him, alongside the expected expense to the Top of the Division through the Manager and will show up before the Exhaustive Report Survey Board of trustees (CRRC) led by the Senior member of the Personnel ( Dignitary Research without a trace of Dignitary of the Staff), which will survey the Far reaching Progress Report and will suggest/reject expansion for a period upto one year. These cases will be sent to Bad habit Chancellor for endorsement. The expansion can be conceded just upto 2 years however each year in turn.
  • Approbation of Postponement
  • Following six years, an up-and-comer can look for approbation of postponement for 6th and seventh year from the Bad habit Chancellor by paying the expected charge. No augmentation or condonotion of defer will be permitted following 6 years. Notwithstanding the necessary charge for expansion/approbation, an up-and-comer will need to pay the recommended late expenses in the event that the competitor doesn’t have any significant bearing for expansion/approbation in the span of a month from the date of expiry of pertinent time span. The late expense will be chargeable from one month after the expiry of three years for the expansion of 4th& fifth years and after the expiry of five years for the approbation of postponement of 6th and seventh years. The absolute time of accommodation of Ph.D postulation, will for no situation surpass six years. No expansion/approbation of postponement for the accommodation of the postulation will be permitted past the time of seven years. The equivalent will likewise apply to re-enlistment applications.
  • Board of Analysts
  • An Inspector’s Board Council (EPC) would present a board of least of ten analysts, something like half of whom will be from inside the district i.e., Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Chandigarh and Delhi and half from outside the locale including far off nations showing the full specifics about their assignment, area of specialization and addresses and so on for the assessment of the proposition. The Bad habit – Chancellor will choose two analysts from the board and somewhere around one of them would be from outside the district with the exception of proposal submitted in Punjabi medium.
  • The people suggested for assessment of the proposal ought to perpetually be of Teacher or of identical position. In the event that an Analyst of the position of Teacher isn’t accessible in a subject, the Bad habit Chancellor be approved to investigate the matter and make a suitable move. For the subject of Regulation, Judges of High Court/High Court could likewise be named.
  • In the event of resigned people, their last assignment will be shown without which the board would be thought of as fragmented.
  • Given that in the subject where the proposal is written in Punjabi medium and Punjabi knowing analysts of Teacher’s position are not accessible from outside the locale, every one of the inspectors could be taken from inside the district.
  • The Inspector’s Board Council (EPC) will record a declaration with this impact that adequate Punjabi knowing analysts of Teacher’s position are not accessible from outside the district.
  • The analyst will be allowed to look for explanation on any matter from up-and-comer’s boss or the co-manager through the Senior member Research. The Senior member Research will guarantee the mystery of inspector’s character. The analyst after due assessment of proposition will state in his/her report:
  • Whether he/she prescribes the honor of the degree to the up-and-comer subsequent to holding viva-voce assessment.
  • Whether he/she suggests resubmission of the proposition after correction. In the event that an inspector suggests correction of the proposal he/she will likewise show the idea of changes expected to be made in the postulation.
  • Whether he/she suggests dismissal of proposition.
  • A rundown of inquiries that he/she would like the possibility to reply in the viva – voce assessment is to be provided in a different cover.
  • Whether he/she suggests that the proposal is good supposed to be available for public viewing or not. In the event that fit for distribution, regardless of changes. If with changes, the nature and degree of changes be expressed.
  • In case of an analyst making proposals for correction/change of the postulation, the competitor will be allowed to shield his/her perspective through the Dignitary Research, assuming he so wants. Nonetheless, in the event that the analyst isn’t happy with the up-and-comer’s guard, the applicant will be expected to complete essential amendment/alteration as at long last proposed by the analyst before his/her case is handled further. It very well might be added that an Inspector can suggest update of theory just a single time. On the off chance that a subsequent correction is suggested by a similar Outside Inspector, it will be treated as dismissal of proposal.
  • The applicant who is expected to resubmit the proposal, should do as such in somewhere around one year from the date of supply of remarks of the analyst to him/her by the University regardless of his/her accommodation of safeguard except if augmentation is extraordinarily allowed by the Bad habit – Chancellor. A re-submitted postulation will be inspected by the inspector who had suggested re – accommodation except if he/she himself/herself can’t do so or declines to do as such.
  • In case of one of the inspectors suggesting the honor of the degree and the subsequent analyst suggesting dismissal of the postulation; with the consent of the Bad habit Chancellor, the proposal will be alluded to a third inspector to be named by the Bad habit – Chancellor from out of the first board of inspectors. The third inspector will not be educated regarding the suggestions of the two analysts. The suggestions of those two inspectors who submit comparative proposals will be conclusive. This technique will likewise be followed assuming the analyst who has proposed change dismisses the overhauled postulation. Every inspector will be given one month’s the ideal opportunity for the assessment of proposal.
  • On the off chance that report from him/her isn’t gotten, he/she might be reminded telephonically. After the expiry of a time of 90 days, on the off chance that no report is gotten, the following inspector might be designated. The main inspector will be mentioned to send the proposition back. Assuming that at the appropriate time, the report is gotten from the principal analyst, the report won’t be thought of.
  • Essence of Reports
  • The reports of analysts (barring the inquiries recommended for the viva-voce) will be opened in the Screening Advisory group meeting. The Screening Panel will set up a significance of the reports of the inspectors and the Senior member of the Staff (Dignitary Research without any Senior member Workforce) will send the substance of reports in two weeks or less. These will be set before the Bad habit Chancellor for choice in regards to the lead of viva-voce assessment and the arrangement of one of the analysts will be made by Bad habit Chancellor in the event of reports of the two inspectors are positive. The Screening Advisory group will bring up the qualities and shortcomings, if any, in the reports. A duplicate of the report of Screening Panel without uncovering the names of the inspectors will be given to the contender to completing vital changes including those of composing, references and verifiable mistakes and so on before the direct viva – voce assessment.
  • Viva-Voce Assessment
  • But on account of a proposition, which is dismissed, viva-voce will be held as per the guidelines recommended for this sake by the University. An open viva-voce will be directed for applicants whom the two inspectors have suggested for the honor of Ph.D. degree.
  • The Viva-Voce assessment will fundamentally be intended to test the comprehension of the competitor on the topic of the proposal, including research technique utilized, results, ends showed up at the degree of ability in the field of review. The applicant will likewise explain the focuses raised by the analysts if any, in their reports.
  • The viva-voce assessment will be of essentially of 45 minutes term and will be necessary for every one of the applicants. This will typically be led at Mandi Gobindgarh by one of the two outer inspectors who have assessed the proposition.
  • The Top of the Division and the Manager of the competitor will be related with the lead of the viva-voce to be organized by the Top of the Division in no less than one month of receipt of implication about similar inquiries during Vive-Voce will be posed to by the outside analyst.
  • There will be a show ideally Power Point Show by the possibility for around 20 minutes before the board comprising of, Senior member of the Staff, Top of the Division and Manager/Co-Boss of the up-and-comer. The whole Office/staff would be welcome to the viva-voce. The Senior member Research in the event that accessible will be Director of the Council. Inquiries during Viva-Voce will be asked by the outside inspector as it were.
  • The majority for holding the viva-voce Assessment will be five individuals. The inspectors might send, in the event that they so want, alongside their reports, inquiries for use by the Board leading the viva-voce (oral) assessment.
  • In the event that an outer analyst can’t direct a viva – voce, a bunch of inquiries will be gotten by the Senior member Research which will be led by an inspector (third Analyst) delegated by the Bad habit Chancellor. A duplicate of the proposition will be shipped off the third Inspector.
  • The report about the presentation of the applicant in the viva – voce assessment will be recorded by the outside examiner(s) as it were.
  • After fulfillment of the Viva-Voce assessment, the Director of the Viva-Voce advisory group will unite the proposals for the honor of Ph.D. Degree to the up-and-comer.
  • Grant of Degrees
  • Assuming the two analysts of the proposition have suggested the honor of the degree and the viva-voce analyst having fulfilled himself based on execution of the competitor in the oral assessment, that the up-and-comer has composed the postulation himself, may suggest the honor of the Ph.D degree to the Research Grant Advisory group (RAC).
  • The RAC would consider the significance of reports ready by the Screening Board and the report of the analyst who has directed the Viva – Voce assessment (every one of the reports in unique will be laid on the table for showing up at a choice with respect to the honor of the degree).
  • An up-and-comer whose proposal is “Dismissed” by the inspectors, the enrollment will be dropped and he might be enlisted in the future for the Ph. D degree with a similar subject after he/she makes a composed solicitation with that impact.
  • The aftereffect of Ph.D. level of an up-and-comer is considered to have been proclaimed on the date of meeting of RAC where he is pronounced temporarily qualified for the honor of degree which will be at long last endorsed by the Scholastic Chamber and supported by the Bad habit Chancellor. The Enlistment center/Regulator of Assessment will distribute the outcome.
  • The Research Researcher whosoever is seeking after Ph.D under financed project or has been granted Patent will be respected with unique excellence in Ph.D
  • Vault with the University and Inflibnet
  • All Ph.D. applicants will need to submit four hard bound duplicates of their Ph.D. postulation alongside four separate Compact discs to the workplace of Senior member Research before the lead of Viva – Voce assessment through their Boss and Top of the Divisions. The workplace of Dignitary Research will send one Disc to the University Library, one Album to INFLIBNET and one Cd will be shipped off University PC Community for transferring the Ph.D. proposition on the University site, after the gathering of Research Grant Council and warning of the Ph.D Degree by the University.
  • Storehouse with INFLIBNET, for facilitating something very similar to make it open to all Foundations/Schools
  • Supply of Reports
  • The reports of the inspectors might be provided to the competitor after statement of the outcome without unveiling the personality of the analysts. The Ph.D proposition analysts be conveyed that in the event of acknowledgment of the postulation for the honor of the degree to the up-and-comer, the reports would be provided to the applicant.
  • General Control
  • The office will practice disciplinary and general command over the research understudies and theirwork. Generally control will stay with Senior member Research.
  • Distribution
  • The proposition properly supported will just be distributed with the consent of Bad habit – Chancellor and on the suggestion of the Postulation Distribution Board, given that a solicitation is made by the up-and-comer in something like a long time from the honor of Ph.D. Degree. Applications got following three years won’t usually be engaged.
  • Panels and Sheets
  • The structure of the panels and Board at the division/personnel level will be as given underneath:
  • Office Research Board
  • Top of the Division (Administrator) who holds the Ph.D degree or senior most instructor with Ph.D degree.
  • All Teachers in the subject, utilized in Desh Bhagat University
  • Perusers/Academic partners and Teachers/Aide Teachers in the subject who hold Ph.D. Degree.
  • One/two instructors from associated/supporting offices to be selected by the Senior member, Scholastic Undertakings
  • Somewhere around one subject master from outside, particularly where the Ph.D course work is to be settled. The procedures of Division Research Board containing the Ph.D course work will be put before Scholastic Chamber for thought and endorsement.
  • Workforce Research Board (FRB)
  • It will comprise of the accompanying
  • Bad habit Chancellor (Administrator)
  • The Senior member, Scholarly Issues
  • The Senior member Research
  • The Senior member of Personnel/Head of the School
  • All Teachers and the Heads of University showing divisions in the Staff gave further that Teachers/Heads from just such divisions as are taken part in granting Post-Graduate guidance and accomplishing research work will be qualified for arrangement as individuals.
  • Two specialists from outside the University to be selected by the Bad habit – Chancellor for a long time.
  • The Boss of a competitor whose summation is to be considered for endorsement in the gathering of Workforce Research Board (FRB) ought to be available in the
  • concerned gathering of FRB, on the off chance that he isn’t an individual from FRB.
  • Far reaching Report Survey Advisory group (CRRC)
  • Dignitary of the Staff concerned (Executive)
  • Top of the Division who holds a Ph.D degree/senior most employee holding Ph.D degree.
  • Manager and Co-boss, if any.
  • Inspectors Board Council (EPC)
  • The Top of the Division (Director) who holds a Ph.D degree/senior most employee holding D degree.
  • All Teachers in the Office
  • In the event that there is no Teacher other than Top of the Division or the Top of the Division is a Peruser/Academic partner, a Teacher from a united Subject/Office to be named by Bad habit Chancellor.
  • Boss of the Up-and-comer/Co-Manager if any.
  • Where the majority is inadequate, Bad habit Chancellor might choose a couple of Teachers from united subject/division.
  • Screening Board
  • The Senior member of the Staff (Director)
  • The Top of the Division who holds a Ph.D degree/senior most employee holding Ph.D degree.
  • The Boss of the Up-and-comer/Co-Manager if any.
  • A couple of Teachers from inside the Workforce to be named by the Bad habit – Chancellor
  • Where majority is inadequate, the Bad habit Chancellor might choose a couple of Teachers from significant/unified subjects
  • Research Grant Council (RAC)
  • Bad habit Chancellor (Administrator)
  • Senior member, Scholarly Issues
  • Senior member Research
  • Senior member of the Personnel/Head of the School
  • All Tops of the Divisions in the Workforce and one Teacher from every office in the Personnel by pivot as per position for a term of two years.
  • Concerned manager/Co-Boss if any of the up-and-comer.
  • Theory Distribution Panel
  • Senior member of the Personnel (Administrator)
  • Top of the Division who holds a Ph.D degree/senior most employee holding Ph.D degree
  • Manager/Co-Boss if anyplace the Senior member of the Personnel or Top of the Division is the manager, the Bad habit Chancellor would designate one master on the board. In the event that the Senior member of the Staff, Top of the Division and Boss are something similar, Bad habit Chancellor would select two specialists on the council. Two individuals would frame the majority.
  • Majority
  • The majority for every one of the councils and the Sheets gave thus except if explicitly expressed if not in the text will be 33% of the complete strength with no less than three people including executive/convener. In such cases, where Boss/Top of the Division/Dignitary of Staff is similar individual, a couple of people might be selected by the Bad habit – Chancellor to meet with the majority prerequisites.
  • Significant Downloads

PhD Enquiry

Want us to call you ?